Greta said:
>For example the prescribed >vocabulary for 3.19.3.3 for encoding
>format is quite inadequate to the >real-world situation of many newer
>format types and complicated digital >objects like games.
Would that not always be true of any prescribed list? In RDA/MARC21
we can use any popular exact term as unit name, rather than repeating
a more general term from the RDA carrier list. I assume Bibframe
would have a unit name (aka SMD) tag which would accept any desired
terms. For example, the MRIs add "kit" to the RDA carrier list, a
term we often use in collation, and the term we most miss from AACR2's
GMD terms. There will always be a need for terms not in a prescribed
list, as well as lacking a code to substitute for the term.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
