I spent a good deal of time working on high speed duplication recorders. The heads and electronics are much different. More like radio frequency gear. Bias and electronic amp bandwidth are much higher. As for getting it on tape, bear in mind that video tape machines always did it with making the tape speed 'seem'  very fast by rapidly scanning across the width of the tape using multiple heads and a rotating drum...


<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Michael Shoshani <[log in to unmask]> </div><div>Date:11/11/2015  10:25 AM  (GMT-06:00) </div><div>To: [log in to unmask] </div><div>Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] What Your Music Format Says About You </div><div>
</div>I never understood how high speed duplication worked, or was supposed to 
work. Cassette tapes have a very limited frequency response as it is, 
thus it seems to me that at higher speeds a lot of the audio content 
would be sent to the recording head at higher frequencies than either it 
or the tape itself were designed to handle.

Michael Shoshani

On 11/10/2015 18:38, Tom Fine wrote:
> My father had been in the
> tape duping business, in fact one of the first cassette dupers in the
> US. He told me all the compromises and problems involved with high speed
> duplicating, and opined that cassettes were designed as dictation media,
> and they worked great for that but not for high fidelity music
> transmission. He was right.