Dear Dr. Goldman
Please allow me to respond and beg your forgiveness. Finally I learn a bit
about you and am intrigued by your claims. Yes, it does make a difference
what your credentials are and although the burden of proof is still on you,
your degrees do make a difference. If you follow this list then I'm sure
you have read in the past emails bu people claiming all sorts of claims,
that have no holding in real life. So when you make claims that you do not
back up with more than "tens of thousands of users" it's hard for me (I
will not say us because I speak for myself) to follow when there is no data
given to support your claim. You are not willing to give a sample (I did
not ask for one and am not asking for one now), you do not give reference
to any scientific study, so why should I believe any of your claims? Would
you subject your collection to tests of chemicals by someone just because
he claims his products are superior? Don't get me wrong, you may be right,
but you are so defensive in your responses and so secretive that it
automatically raises my guards, because I have been burnt in the past. And
I'm not the only one. I will not do any test of chemicals on a clients'
record, and not on a record in my collection, simply because when it's a
client's record it's my reputation on the line and his prized possession,
and when it's my own record, because it's probably irreplaceable.

I'm not going to give you any advice on how to run your company, you built
it over many years and your strategy obviously works if you're in business
for such a long time, but without some sort of data that I can read and
review I will have a hard time believing your claim, just because you say

Again, please accept my apology. I have the utmost respect for anyone
holding a doctorate. I saw what it takes when my wife got hers and I know I
will never have the patience to sit and study for so many years.

Shai Drori
Expert digitization services for Audio Video
Hi Res scanning for film 8mm-35mm
[log in to unmask]

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:11 AM, H D Goldman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Shai,
> Can’t say I appreciate being referred to as "some dude” but be that as it
> may, I’m not the least bit interested in playing with individuals on this
> list or any other list or trying to convince you to buy anything. That sure
> as Hell was not ever the reason for our efforts.  It had nothing to do with
> any individuals records regardless of substrate.  It was all about
> establishing a reference point for the quality of recorded sound, not
> running a business.
> I’m have a Master’s Degree in Synthetic Organic Chemistry w/ a minor in
> Biochemistry & a doctorate in Medicinal Chemistry w/ a Biochemistry Minor
> focusing on drugs affecting the mammalian central nervous system &
> specifically those involved in Parkinson’s Disease.  A few years as a
> postdoc in these areas & a number of years spent in CNS drug development
> that will see the light of day.
> There are things to be learned from this site & for that reason I’ll stay
> on the list until I or the appropriate individuals decide otherwise but I
> will no longer contribute.   I’ve been at this to long for the grade school
> winning by people who have never heard the results of using these
> materials.  Please do all of us the courtesy of not responding to this post
> as I certainly will  not.
> Duane Goldman
> H D Goldman Lagniappe Chemicals Ltd.
> PO Box 37066 St. Louis, MO 63141 USA
> v/f 314 205 1388  [log in to unmask]
> > On Jan 16, 2016, at 8:45 PM, Shai Drori <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > Not even close to the original. The original was microfiber special type
> of
> > fabric that had a one direction for cleaning. It went into the grove to
> > pick up dirt. For a teenage on a budget it was terrific. The new ones are
> > just corduroy.
> > BTW, I have been reading everything on this thread. I must say That the
> > Goldman dude hasn't convinced me even a bit. Too much vague claims with
> no
> > hard evidence for anything.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Shai Drori
> > Expert digitization services for Audio Video
> > Hi Res scanning for film 8mm-35mm
> >
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> <>
> >>
> >> I bought one of the RCA look-alikes and it is not nearly as good, of
> >> course,
> >> <L>
> >> Lou Judson
> >> Intuitive Audio
> >> 415-883-2689
> >>
> >> On Jan 14, 2016, at 4:15 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I agree that's a good one. Can you get the fluid anymore?
> >>> Another good one is the LAST cleaner -- some sort of smelly solvent
> with
> >> a nail polish brush.
> >>>
> >>> -- Tom Fine
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shai Drori" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 6:55 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cleaning stylus
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I have been using the Discwasher stylus brush that came with my kit
> >> that I
> >>>> bought around 1986. Still works wonders.
> >>