Print

Print


Could someone please make a proposal that 264 have a second indicator
for 'reputed, fictitious, etc." imprint data?

That would allow us to enter the actual publisher in 264 1, rather
than in a note, where few would see it, since most do not go beyond
brief display.

The fictitious imprint does need to be recorded for matching item to
record.

We look like idiots telling patrons that a book was published on Pluto,
or was published in 2115.  An acquisitions librarian is not going to
order a replacement copy from Pluto.

Thank you.

   __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
  {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________