Try using a different approach. Rather than considering Haymarket to be the publisher of the series, consider the series statement to be merely a reprinting of Brill’s statement. Then you can mention it in the 500 note (as below) as a justification for tracing it.

500   Originally published: Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [date]. (Historical materialism book series ; [no.]).

Haymarket is not mentioned in the series authority record, but one could fancy that up my mentioning that the series is being reprinted by Haymarket.


John G. Marr


Zimmerman Library

University of New Mexico

Albuquerque, NM 87010

[log in to unmask]


         **"I really like to know the reasons for what I do!"**

                                             Martha Watson


Opinions belong exclusively to the individuals expressing them, but sharing is permitted.




From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wilson, Pete
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] Series title from two publishers, one numbered, other unnumbered


Hello wise ones,


I am going to ask people on this list a question that I would previously have addressed to my great Vanderbilt colleague Ann Ercelawn, who has, sadly (for me), retired.  She knew more about series than me and when she didn’t know the answer she knew the right people to ask.


Brill publishes a series called Historical materialism book series, for which authority record n 2002096283 was made.  It is a numbered series.  However, Haymarket Books in Chicago has republished many books in this series in paperback, using the same series statement.  The Haymarket editions do not always have numbering, however—my first impression is that early on they may have used the same number as Brill at least sometimes, but that the volumes have been unnumbered for quite some time.  There are a couple of PCC records for Haymarket editions in which the cataloger bracketed in a series number taken from the Brill website (there is an explicit note to that effect).


Haymarket has been doing this since 2005.  Shouldn’t there be a separate authority record for the Haymarket series?  There is not; nor is there an additional 643 on the Brill authority record for Chicago and Haymarket.  The numbering fixed field is set at “c” on the Brill authority, however, perhaps because of the lack of numbering on Haymarket editions.


Thanks for any help you can give!


Pete Wilson

Vanderbilt University