Print

Print


I am checking with the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, the contributor of the record in VIAF showing the 1931 date.

 

Sincerely,

 

--Linda

 

Linda Gabel

OCLC · Senior Product Operations Manager, Data Services + WC Quality Mgt

OCLC-VIAF Liaison

6565 Kilgour Place, Dublin, Ohio USA 43017

T +1-614-764-6374 · T +1-800-848-5878 x6374 · F +1-614-718-7196

OCLC

OCLC.org · Blog · Facebook · Twitter · YouTube

 

 

 

 

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Deborah J. Leslie
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 5:11 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] NAR for Downey, Arthur T, and what to do with incorrect ECIP data

 

The VIAF record ought to be updated, however. Is there an established mechanism for doing that?

 

Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S. | Senior Cataloger, Folger Shakespeare Library | [log in to unmask] | 202.675-0369 | 201 East Capitol St., SE, Washington, DC 20003 | www. folger.edu | orcid.org/0000-0001-5848-5467

 

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Policy and Standards Division
Sent: Wednesday, 06 April 2016 16:49
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] NAR for Downey, Arthur T, and what to do with incorrect ECIP data

 

Since the 100 form is “Downey, Arthur T.” with no date, there is no need to change that heading nor to add a 400.  We only add dates to existing NARs for persons when we need to break a conflict per LC-PCC 9.19.1.4.

 

Adding another 670 or two with the correct date of birth is a good thing to do.

 

Kate James

Policy and Standards Division

Library of Congress

 

 

 

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hall, Jack
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 3:11 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] NAR for Downey, Arthur T, and what to do with incorrect ECIP data

 

A quick reply, Alexis.

 

I would add a 670 (or more than one) giving the correct birthdate, and change the 100, using the correct birth date. The present 100 can be changed to a 400 with |w nne indicating that it was an earlier valid form. I would leave in any 670s that gave the incorrect date.

 

Jack Hall

Music Cataloger

Metadata and Digitization Services

University of Houston Libraries

Houston, TX 77204-2000

A Carnegie-designated Tier One public research university

phone: 713 743 9687

fax: 713 743 9748

email: [log in to unmask]

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alexis Zirpoli
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 1:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] NAR for Downey, Arthur T, and what to do with incorrect ECIP data

 

Greetings,

 

I am in the process of upgrading the record for Arthur T. Downey (OCLC ARN 477263, LCCN n 80096255). I see in the second 670 that there is a birthdate which is wrong. According to Lexis Public Records and Who's Who (http://search.marquiswhoswho.com/profile/100004010278), this Mr. Downey was born August 17, 1937. I also see that the DNB (via VIAF) has this incorrect birthdate as part of the 100 field (http://viaf.org/processed/DNB%7C1068984007).

 

My question is this: what do we do with erroneous information in an authority record's 670 field when it comes from ECIP data? Do I insert another note indicating that the ECIP data is wrong, or can I remove the erroneous information? 

 

Thanks!

--

Alexis Zirpoli

Cataloging Services Librarian

University of Michigan Law Library

734-647-1563