 |
 |
Sorry, I meant rdfs:label. From: Joseph Kiegel Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 8:34 AM To: 'Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum' <[log in to unmask]> Subject: RE: [BIBFRAME] rdf:value So is rdfs:value. The question is: what is the “appropriate” difference between the two? From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robert Sanderson Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 8:26 AM To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] rdf:value It's the value of the resource to which it's attached. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Joseph Kiegel <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: bf:identifiedBy [ a bf:Isbn rdf:value “9783110413014” ] . Example 2 bf:identifiedBy [ a identifier:ABC ; rdf:value “MX3-387” ] . Example 3 bf:identifiedBy [ a bf:Identifier ; bf:source “xyz” ; rdf:value “1234567890” ] . There is an ISBN, and its value is 9783... There is an ABC identifier, and its value is MX3-387 There is an untyped identifier from source system xyz, and it's value is 123... Notes Example 3 bf:baseMaterial [ bf:code [ rdf:value “o” ; bf:source [rdf:value “marc007ng04” ] ] ; bf:note [ a bf:Note ; rdfs:label “Image printed on thick gold paper.” ] ] . There is an untyped resource, which one imagines is a Code, with value "o". There is an untyped resource, which is some sort of Source, with value "marc007..." Item Example (truncated) <http://bibframe.example.org/item/itemZ> bf:shelfMarkLcc [rdf:value “LB2395.C65 1991” ] ; bf:usageAndAccessPolicy [ a bf:AccessPolicy ; rdf:value “unrestricted” ] . There is an LCC, and its value is LB... There is a Policy and its value is "unrestricted" Note -- this use is not very machine friendly. A better model would have identifiable policies, with their own URIs. HTH, Rob -- Rob Sanderson Semantic Architect The Getty Trust Los Angeles, CA 90049