Sorry, I meant rdfs:label.
So is rdfs:value. The question is: what is the “appropriate” difference between the two?
From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Robert Sanderson
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 8:26 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] rdf:value
It's the value of the resource to which it's attached.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Joseph Kiegel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
bf:identifiedBy [ a bf:Isbn
rdf:value “9783110413014” ] .
bf:identifiedBy [ a identifier:ABC ;
rdf:value “MX3-387” ] .
bf:identifiedBy [ a bf:Identifier ;
bf:source “xyz” ;
rdf:value “1234567890” ] .
There is an ISBN, and its value is 9783...
There is an ABC identifier, and its value is MX3-387
There is an untyped identifier from source system xyz, and it's value is 123...
bf:code [ rdf:value “o” ;
bf:source [rdf:value “marc007ng04” ] ] ;
bf:note [ a bf:Note ;
rdfs:label “Image printed on thick gold paper.” ] ] .
There is an untyped resource, which one imagines is a Code, with value "o".
There is an untyped resource, which is some sort of Source, with value "marc007..."
bf:shelfMarkLcc [rdf:value “LB2395.C65 1991” ] ;
a bf:AccessPolicy ;
rdf:value “unrestricted” ] .
There is an LCC, and its value is LB...
There is a Policy and its value is "unrestricted"
Note -- this use is not very machine friendly. A better model would have identifiable policies, with their own URIs.
The Getty Trust
Los Angeles, CA 90049