On Jun 20, 2016 11:40 AM, "Denenberg, Ray" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Joe - 
> We too found the W3C specs of little use here.  But the BIBFRAME view is that rdf:value supplies content that is machine processable; the content of rdfs:label is intended for display. 
> There may a case or two that doesn’t exactly conform to this distinction (your example of  bf:AccessPolicy rdf:value “unrestricted”   perhaps should instead be rdfs:label) but that’s the general rule of thumb.

It's probably not a good idea to use rdf:value with bibframe, as the bibframe RDF convention is to use separate properties for object and data values.

Also, rdf:value cannot be used with OWL tools, as is in a reserved namespace and not explicitly permitted.