Print

Print


>
> It's probably not a good idea to use rdf:value with bibframe, as the
> bibframe RDF convention is to use separate properties for object and data
> values.


Can you say more about this Simon? Does rdf:value have special meaning
w.r.t. owl:ObjectProperty/DataProperty that I'm not aware of?

- Tom

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Simon Spero <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Jun 20, 2016 11:40 AM, "Denenberg, Ray" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > Joe -
> >
> > We too found the W3C specs of little use here.  But the BIBFRAME view is
> that rdf:value supplies content that is machine processable; the content of
> rdfs:label is intended for display.
> >
> > There may a case or two that doesn’t exactly conform to this distinction
> (your example of  bf:AccessPolicy rdf:value “unrestricted”   perhaps should
> instead be rdfs:label) but that’s the general rule of thumb.
>
> It's probably not a good idea to use rdf:value with bibframe, as the
> bibframe RDF convention is to use separate properties for object and data
> values.
>
> Also, rdf:value cannot be used with OWL tools, as is in a reserved
> namespace and not explicitly permitted.
>
> Simon
>