Gene,
Thanks. Are you sure the authority isn’t for the work? I notice there are a number of authorities for expressions with languages in $l.
Ted Gemberling
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 2:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] What RDA are we following, again expression with original language
It is in NAF,
Gene
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Gemberling, Ted P <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Gene,
I don’t get that work when I search for OCLC 40450. Did you leave out some digits? I would not want
to try looking it up under the title, because there are probably many bib records with that title.
Ted Gemberling
UAB Lister Hill Library
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 1:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] What RDA are we following, again expression with original language
Please see the following OCLC record *40450 for Scriptores Augustae historiae.
After having many discussions on these lists, I was led to believe that the 1## line in the AAP should have the language, in this case $l Latin, since
it is an expression.
This record is coded as RDA and updated by DLC among others. Why is not $l Latin not included?
Gene Fieg