Print

Print


You ARE right.  It is the work record.  The only real indication of that is
the list of 430s.


Gene

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Gemberling, Ted P <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Gene,
>
> Thanks. Are you sure the authority isn’t for the work? I notice there are
> a number of authorities for expressions with languages in $l.
>
>
>
> Ted Gemberling
>
>
>
> *From:* Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]
> GOV] *On Behalf Of *Gene Fieg
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 06, 2016 2:05 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: [PCCLIST] What RDA are we following, again expression with
> original language
>
>
>
> It is in NAF,
>
>
>
> Gene
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Gemberling, Ted P <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> Gene,
>
> I don’t get that work when I search for OCLC 40450. Did you leave out some
> digits? I would not want to try looking it up under the title, because
> there are probably many bib records with that title.
>
>
>
> Ted Gemberling
>
> UAB Lister Hill Library
>
>
>
> *From:* Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]
> GOV] *On Behalf Of *Gene Fieg
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 06, 2016 1:15 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* [PCCLIST] What RDA are we following, again expression with
> original language
>
>
>
> Please see the following OCLC record *40450 for Scriptores Augustae
> historiae.
>
> After having many discussions on these lists, I was led to believe that
> the 1## line in the AAP should have the language, in this case $l Latin,
> since it is an expression.
>
>
>
> This record is coded as RDA and updated by DLC among others.  Why is not
> $l Latin not included?
>
>
>
> Gene Fieg
>
>
>