You ARE right.  It is the work record.  The only real indication of that is the list of 430s.


Gene

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Gemberling, Ted P <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Gene,

Thanks. Are you sure the authority isn’t for the work? I notice there are a number of authorities for expressions with languages in $l.

 

Ted Gemberling

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]GOV] On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 2:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] What RDA are we following, again expression with original language

 

It is in NAF,

 

Gene

 

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Gemberling, Ted P <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Gene,

I don’t get that work when I search for OCLC 40450. Did you leave out some digits? I would not want to try looking it up under the title, because there are probably many bib records with that title.

 

Ted Gemberling

UAB Lister Hill Library

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]GOV] On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 1:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] What RDA are we following, again expression with original language

 

Please see the following OCLC record *40450 for Scriptores Augustae historiae.  

After having many discussions on these lists, I was led to believe that the 1## line in the AAP should have the language, in this case $l Latin, since it is an expression.

 

This record is coded as RDA and updated by DLC among others.  Why is not $l Latin not included?

 

Gene Fieg