These designators aren’t intended for humans. In fact I’m coming to the conclusion that the whole thing is no longer intended for humans.






(my opinions, not necessarily those of any other human, or RDF triple).



Richard Moore

Authority Control Team Manager

The British Library


Tel.: +44 (0)1937 546104                                  

E-mail: [log in to unmask]      




From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robert Maxwell
Sent: 30 March 2017 16:01
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Relationship designators




This is, in my opinion, an example of tinkering with the relationship designators gone awry. Until the April 2016 update K.2.3 had the relationship designator “incumbent” (with no explicit reciprocal given, but presumably the horrible “officiated corporate body”). “Incumbent”/hypothetical ”incumbent of” would be the right designator for this relationship. However, in April 2016 “incumbent” was deleted and “officer”, “chief executive” and “trustee” were substituted.


I agree “Chief executive of” is not appropriate for the relationship you cite. There was a perfectly good designator pre-April 2016, but bizarrely it was removed.




Robert L. Maxwell
Ancient Languages and Special Collections Librarian
6728 Harold B. Lee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602


From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Hostage
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 8:08 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Relationship designators


Relationship designators have not been defined for every possible relationship, nor is that even possible.


The NAR for Donald Trump has been updated with a

510 1 ǂi Chief executive of: ǂa United States. ǂb President (2017- : Trump) ǂw r


The NAR for his term in office has a reciprocal 500.  Obama has received the same treatment.


However, Trump is not chief executive of his term in office.  He is, sadly, chief executive of the entire United States.


These AAPs for heads of state, etc., are strange concoctions.  They are not really corporate bodies.  They merely represent a specific role of the person, when he or she acts in an official capacity.


There are times when a simple “see also” relationship would be both simpler and more accurate.  This is one of them.




John Hostage

Senior Continuing Resources Cataloger

Harvard Library--Information and Technical Services

Langdell Hall 194

Harvard Law School Library

Cambridge, MA 02138

[log in to unmask]

+(1)(617) 495-3974 (voice)

+(1)(617) 496-4409 (fax)
ISNI 0000 0000 4028 0917


Experience the British Library online at
The British Library’s latest Annual Report and Accounts :
Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book.
The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the [log in to unmask] : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author.
Think before you print