A question for someone who was close to Phase II of the transition of the LC/NAF:

Were authority records that started with a 110 subfield “a” that had a country name and also contained a “$t Treaties, etc.” included as a category to get the programmatic 667 field “THIS 1XX FIELD CANNOT BE USED UNDER RDA UNTIL THIS RECORD HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND/OR UPDATED”?

Just wondering.  Thanks.

Carl

Carl Horne

Slavic and Central Eurasian Cataloger

& NACO/SACO Liaison

Indiana University Library

Bloomington, IN  47405