This is actually a series access point for a multipart monograph.  Such access points will always need an addition.  It would make no sense to say “Lonergan, Bernard J. F. ǂt Works ; ǂv v. 4.”



John Hostage

Senior Continuing Resources Cataloger

Harvard Library--Information and Technical Services

Langdell Hall 194

Harvard Law School Library

Cambridge, MA 02138

[log in to unmask]

+(1)(617) 495-3974 (voice)

+(1)(617) 496-4409 (fax)
ISNI 0000 0000 4028 0917


From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wilson, Pete
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 13:46
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] Queston about "Works" authority record with qualifier


Hi folks,


I am curious about a “Works” name-title authority record.


The NACO authority with heading


Lonergan, Bernard J. F. $t Works. $f 1988


was recently changed to


Lonergan, Bernard J. F. $t Works (Lonergan Research Institute)


I don’t believe this is legitimate RDA usage, is it? 


My understanding is that there is only one “Works” work for each author, possibly with multiple expressions.  The parenthetical qualifier here is at the work level, and thus distinguishes this “work” from other “works” that constitute the complete works of Lonergan.  (Getting through these multiple senses of “work” is a lot of work.)  That does not seem to be correct.




Pete Wilson

Vanderbilt University