Cicero’s works are traditionally so grouped. The NARs could be improved by clarifying which works are included in each group (listing them in a 677/678 and/or recording 500 “container of (work)” relationships), but in my opinion they are fine in RDA.
Robert L. Maxwell
Ancient Languages and Special Collections Librarian
6728 Harold B. Lee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
I am/was working on AAPs for Cicero's works. For some I had created a larger expression, Works. Sellections or Essays. Selections.
But now I see AACR2 AAPs:
Cicero. Philosophical works
Cicero. Rhetorical works
These have not been reviewed; dont see a 667 field. Are these still valid in RDA? Or they be more properly brought into line with RDA.