Posting on behalf of my OCLC colleague, John Chapman:


Hi Adam,


Thank you for your post and yes, we do have this on our list for future review.  Although this will not be included in our upcoming releases of WorldShare Record Manager, it will be considered as we plan for the future. 




John Chapman

Sr. Product Manager

WorldShare Metadata Services



Cynthia M. Whitacre

Manager, WorldCat Metadata Quality, Global Product Management

6565 Kilgour Place, Dublin, Ohio USA 43017

T +1-614-764-6183 · or +1-800-848-5878, ext.6183

OCLC · Facebook · Twitter · YouTube





From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 8:53 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] RDA metadata fields in name authority records




My understanding is that the next generation of OCLC's cataloging software will be able to control the terms used in 3XX fields of authorities and bibliographic records.  I've certainly raised that as a need in discussions with folks from OCLC and have been told that the successor to Connexion will be able to do this.  I'd like to see ILS vendors and authority control vendors also implement authority control over these fields.  Hopefully someone from OCLC and various vendors is reading this and might be willing to comment on their plans?


Adam Schiff

University of Washington Libraries

[log in to unmask]


From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Moore, Richard <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 11:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RDA metadata fields in name authority records


How useful are the terms we record in RDA metadata fields in name authority records? That is, the 046 field, and the various 3XX fields.


Given the time it takes to record, does anyone think this data is being used for anything, or is likely to be useful in any way? Not in theory, but in actual fact?


It seems to me that the main functions of a name authority record for a person are these:


To identify a person uniquely to a user looking at the authority record.

To provide a means of collocating bibliographic records with the correct person in resource discovery.

To provide enough information for automated matching in ISNI.  


The additional 046/3XX fields are, as I understand it, intended to be used in displays in a way that no system does, and to provide a machine-readable means of achieving some kind of linked data goal. However, the fields are optional in NACO and are not included consistently. There is no requirement to use controlled terms, or to establish the terms in controlled vocabularies (SACO will not even accept proposals for new LCSH used in NARs). Terms that *are* taken from controlled vocabularies (LC/NAF, LCSH,  LCDGT, etc.) are not maintained. So I’m uncertain of their value as potentially linked data.


Meanwhile, PCC is working towards an identifier-based model of identity management. ISNI matches data primarily on form of name, dates, and associated titles, and doesn’t make use of the RDA metadata fields in NARs (affiliations in particular have performed poorly as factors in algorithmic matching of identities).


The first two goals above can also be achieved just by recording preferred and variant names, and the source information we have recorded in 670 fields since the year dot (and still record to justify the content of 046/3XX).


It’s often the case that by the time everyone has implemented a new thing, the paradigm has shifted again and much of the new thing is no longer useful.


Resourcing constraints suggest that we should look at these things quite closely.






(My opinions, not necessarily those of anyone else)



Richard Moore

Authority Control Team Manager

The British Library


Tel.: +44 (0)1937 546104                                  

E-mail: [log in to unmask]      




Experience the British Library online at

The British Library’s latest Annual Report and Accounts :

Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book.

The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled


The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the [log in to unmask] : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.

The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author.


Think before you print