That would be great.

Gene

On Friday, May 19, 2017, Amber Billey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Can we simply just live-stream it and record it on YouTube or Facebook? Do we really have to go through ALA and the "proper" channels to facilitate greater access and preserve this important presentation?



On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Gene Fieg <[log in to unmask]');" target="_blank">[log in to unmask]> wrote:
BOOOO!

Gene

On Thursday, May 18, 2017, Fletcher, Peter <[log in to unmask]');" target="_blank">[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Regarding the records, I understand it will not be; ALA is recording fewer meeting/presentations I have heard.

Peter

 

 

Peter Fletcher

Team Leader, International Team

Cyrillic Catalog Librarian & Metadata Specialist

UCLA Cataloging & Metadata Center

11020 Kinross Avenue

Box 957230

Los Angeles, CA 90095-7230

 

[log in to unmask]

 

310-206-3927 (Office)

310-794-9357

 

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]OV] On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 12:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] ALCTS, CaMMS, SAC ALA Annual meeting Program Monday June 26, 2017, 1-2:30 pm

 

Cant afford to vo two conferences in two weeks.  Will this be recorded

 

Gene Fieg

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017, Fletcher, Peter <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Excuse cross-posting, and please join us for: ALCTS, CaMMS, Subject Analysis Committee Presentation at the ALA Annual meeting Program, Monday June 26, 2017, 1-2:30 pm

McCormick Place, W183b

 

Topic: Subjects in authority records: looking towards a linked data future

 

Speakers:

 

Robert L. Maxwell

Ancient Languages and Special Collections Librarian

Harold B. Lee Library

Brigham Young University

Adam L. Schiff

Principal Cataloger

University of Washington Libraries

Description: Currently, subject relationships may be recorded in NACO records only between entities established in the LC/NACO Authority File.  Relationships to terms in other thesauri such as LCSH or LCGFT are currently prohibited.  In a linked data future, it would be useful to record subject relationships in work records and genre/form relationships in work or expression records, since the information would only need to be recorded once and then could be inherited by all the expressions of that work, or all manifestations of the expression. It would be useful to begin recording these relationships in MARC so that when the data migrates to whatever format we have in the future the relationships will already be recorded.

 

Please come and hear what two experts have to say on this topic.

 

Peter Fletcher

Team Leader, International Team

Cyrillic Catalog Librarian & Metadata Specialist

UCLA Cataloging & Metadata Center

11020 Kinross Avenue

Box 957230

Los Angeles, CA 90095-7230

 

[log in to unmask]

 

310-206-3927 (Office)

310-794-9357