Print

Print


So was this set to the 639 JAC list by mistake, or is there some relevance for the 639 JAC?


Peter (one e)

-----Original Message-----
From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 4:59 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [iso15924-jac] Revised RA report for final review

He is a member of the ISO 15924 JAC

> On 21 Jul 2017, at 17:03, Melinda lyons <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Peeter,
> 
> I am the Secretary for the JAC. I was away when you sent your message, which came to me through a forward from Michael Everson.
> 
> You say your name should appear in place of Francois Demay, but appear where, in which context or document? If you are a part of the JAC list, I will need your full name and email address to add you. It is important that we get our records updated, as there will soon be a new vote on the code for Montenegrin. Background documents will be sent out next week.
> 
> Thank you for your help with this.
> 
> Melinda Lyons
> JAC Secretary
> ISO 639-3 RA
> SIL International
> 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd.
> Dallas, TX 75236
> 
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Just a short note that my name should appear instead of François Demay.
> 
> Peeter
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Peeter Päll
> Eesti Keele Instituut / Institute of the Estonian Language 
> Roosikrantsi 6
> 10119 Tallinn, Eesti/Estonia
> Tel:  +372-6177528
> Faks: +372-6177550
> [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], 
> [log in to unmask]
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.eki.ee&data=02%7C01%7Cpetercon%40MICROSOFT.COM%7Ca3a042bcb3554f382c4b08d4d0948669%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636362783705097542&sdata=oHi5yZ8YLD%2BN2LaSQgJPCGKLGd3Q9lPdqF5k4WLeVfY%3D&reserved=0
>