Print

Print


Why not a 700 field with Smith, John, $e writer of foreword, or $e writer
of introduction, or $e writer of supplementary textual content? RDA I.3.1
(in Appendix I [eye]).

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Kevin M Randall <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> I would follow RDA 7.16, Supplementary Content, and give an unstructured
> description of the prologue as per 24.4.3 and 25.1.1.3. For example:
> "Includes: Prologo, by [author of prologue]."
>
>
>
> Kevin M. Randall
>
> Principal Serials Cataloger
>
> Northwestern University Libraries
>
> Northwestern University
>
> www.library.northwestern.edu
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
> 847.491.2939 <(847)%20491-2939>
>
>
>
> Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!
>
>
>
> *From:* Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]
> GOV] *On Behalf Of *Ratliff, Louise
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 18, 2017 12:13 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* [PCCLIST] Statement of responsibility question
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
>     This is a simple question, but I cannot satisfy myself that I have
> found the appropriate instructions in RDA.  I wish to include as a
> statement of responsibility the author of a prolog to a work that I am
> describing.  This prolog author is specific only to this edition of the
> work, not to other editions of the work.  The prolog author’s name only
> exists at the end of the prolog, which is outside of the preferred source
> of information for the title, but within the manifestation.  I believe that
> I may simply transcribe this author’s name and include the word “prologo”
> [Spanish] to indicate his responsibility.  Is this correct?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Louise
>



-- 
Ann Heinrichs
Metadata/Cataloging Librarian
The Paul Bechtold Library
Catholic Theological Union
5401 S. Cornell Ave.
Chicago, IL 60615
http://www.ctu.edu/library
[log in to unmask]