Print

Print


Why not a 700 field with Smith, John, $e writer of foreword, or $e writer of introduction, or $e writer of supplementary textual content? RDA I.3.1 (in Appendix I [eye]).

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Kevin M Randall <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I would follow RDA 7.16, Supplementary Content, and give an unstructured description of the prologue as per 24.4.3 and 25.1.1.3. For example: "Includes: Prologo, by [author of prologue]."

 

Kevin M. Randall

Principal Serials Cataloger

Northwestern University Libraries

Northwestern University

www.library.northwestern.edu

[log in to unmask]

847.491.2939

 

Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]GOV] On Behalf Of Ratliff, Louise
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 12:13 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] Statement of responsibility question

 

Hi all,

 

    This is a simple question, but I cannot satisfy myself that I have found the appropriate instructions in RDA.  I wish to include as a statement of responsibility the author of a prolog to a work that I am describing.  This prolog author is specific only to this edition of the work, not to other editions of the work.  The prolog author’s name only exists at the end of the prolog, which is outside of the preferred source of information for the title, but within the manifestation.  I believe that I may simply transcribe this author’s name and include the word “prologo” [Spanish] to indicate his responsibility.  Is this correct?

 

Thanks,

Louise




--
Ann Heinrichs
Metadata/Cataloging Librarian
The Paul Bechtold Library
Catholic Theological Union
5401 S. Cornell Ave.
Chicago, IL 60615
http://www.ctu.edu/library
[log in to unmask]