Print

Print


LC catalog shows two different ways. Can we have some explanations?

... ǂx Foreign public opinion, South Korean
(as in LCCN    96451461 )

OR:

... ǂx Foreign public opinion, Korean (South)
(as in LCCN   2003417004)



On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Erica Chang <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Then how do we always come up with the appropriate adjective form for each
> country if we don't necessarily point to the authority rec?  For South
> Korea case, I would use --Foreign public opinion, South Korean. I would
> inferred it from authority rec like Corporations, South Korean. And a
> dictionary says South Korean is an adjective derived from South Korea.
>
> What about Congo (Brazzaville)?
> There are authority rec such as Painting, Congo (Brazzaville) and
>  Painting, Congolese (Democratic Republic).
> For Congo (Brazzaville), would we use --Foreign public opinion, Congo? Or
> --Foreign public opinion, Congo (Brazzaville)? or  --Foreign public
> opinion, Congolese for both?  If we use --Foreign public opinion, Congolese
> for both, do I have to use
> --Foreign public opinion, Korean?  There is a book about South Korean's
> opinion on North Korea.
>
> *Erica S. Chang*
> Head, Cataloging Department
> University of Hawaii at Manoa Library
> 2550 McCarthy Mall
> Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
> (808) 956-2768
> [log in to unmask]
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Hostage, John <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> SHM H 1955 says, “qualify the subdivision –Foreign public opinion by the
>> adjective designating the region or country where the opinion is held.”
>> That would point to using “Arab.”
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------
>>
>> John Hostage
>>
>> Senior Continuing Resources Cataloger
>>
>> Harvard Library--Information and Technical Services
>>
>> Langdell Hall 194
>>
>> Harvard Law School Library
>>
>> Cambridge, MA 02138
>>
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>> +(1)(617) 495-3974 <(617)%20495-3974> (voice)
>>
>> +(1)(617) 496-4409 <(617)%20496-4409> (fax)
>> ISNI 0000 0000 4028 0917
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> OV] *On Behalf Of *Netanel Ganin
>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 29, 2017 09:45
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> *Subject:* [PCCLIST] Arab countries versus Arab as subdivision
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear CW,
>>
>>
>>
>> When using a multiple subdivision such as *—Foreign public opinion,
>> Austrian, [British, etc.]*
>>
>>
>>
>> Is "Arab countries" the form used after the comma [as pulled from G 300
>> <http://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeCSM/G300.pdf>] or "Arab"?
>>
>>
>>
>> I ask, because in searching, I've found hits for both [albeit
>> significantly more for --Foreign public opinion, Arab]. If anyone could
>> point me to where the construction "Arab" is being drawn from, I'd be much
>> obliged.
>>
>>
>>
>> thanks!
>>
>>
>> in solidarity,
>>
>>
>>
>> Netanel Ganin
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Metadata Coordinator -- Hebrew Specialty
>>
>> Brandeis University
>>
>> (781) 736-4645 / [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>>
>> My pronouns are he/him/his
>>
>>
>>
>
>