Would it still require coding, if the "extension" constitutes a variant of the standard? And please, LC, it's "superseded" (sniff sniff). RICHARD NOBLE :: RARE MATERIALS CATALOGUER :: JOHN HAY LIBRARY BROWN UNIVERSITY :: PROVIDENCE, R.I. 02912 :: 401-863-1187 <Richard_Noble@Br <[log in to unmask]>own.edu> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Ryan Hildebrand <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On LC’s EDTF page (https://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/) I just > noticed: “*The draft specification is to be superceded; EDTF > functionality has been integrated into a draft revision of ISO 8601 to be > published in 2017 or 2018.” * > > > > *This is the first I have heard of this, and am afraid I have missed > conversations elsewhere on the topic. Are others following the new ISO 8601 > draft (and omitting |2 coding in 046)? * > > > > *Thanks,* > > *Ryan* > > > > Ryan Hildebrand > > Authorities & Special Collections Cataloging Librarian > > University of Oregon Libraries > > 1299 University of Oregon > > Eugene OR 97403-1299 > > (541) 346-1844 > > > > >