Print

Print


Would it still require coding, if the "extension" constitutes a variant of
the standard? And please, LC, it's "superseded" (sniff sniff).

RICHARD NOBLE :: RARE MATERIALS CATALOGUER :: JOHN HAY LIBRARY
BROWN UNIVERSITY  ::  PROVIDENCE, R.I. 02912  ::  401-863-1187
<Richard_Noble@Br <[log in to unmask]>own.edu>

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Ryan Hildebrand <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On LC’s EDTF page (https://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/) I just
> noticed: “*The draft specification is to be superceded; EDTF
> functionality has been integrated into a draft revision of ISO 8601 to be
> published in 2017 or 2018.” *
>
>
>
> *This is the first I have heard of this, and am afraid I have missed
> conversations elsewhere on the topic. Are others following the new ISO 8601
> draft (and omitting |2 coding in 046)? *
>
>
>
> *Thanks,*
>
> *Ryan*
>
>
>
> Ryan Hildebrand
>
> Authorities & Special Collections Cataloging Librarian
>
> University of Oregon Libraries
>
> 1299 University of Oregon
>
> Eugene OR 97403-1299
>
> (541) 346-1844
>
>
>
>
>