Print

Print


Hi, Amber and Joseph.

The document specifying the conversion for the 530-535 fields is 
actually ConvSpec-490,510,530-535-Links-R1p.xlsx 
<http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/mtbf/ConvSpec-490,510,530-535-Links-R1p.xlsx> 
-- I agree that the reference to "Other Linking Entries" in the document 
for the 5XX fields is a little confusing.

A bug was actually just fixed in the LC BF conversion tool around these 
properties (https://github.com/lcnetdev/marc2bibframe2/issues/55). I'm 
not sure when this fix will make it into production. Here's a sample 
record with a 534 so you could see what the conversion looks like (with 
the bug in place, unfortunately): 
http://id.loc.gov/tools/bibframe/compare-lccn/full-rdf?find=2008623009

    wayne

-- 
Wayne Schneider
www.indexdata.com


On 10/4/17 12:56 PM, Amber Billey wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> bf:originalVersion and bf:originalVersionOf are subproperties of 
> bf:derivativeOf and bf:hasDerivative without any defined domain or 
> range; while bf:hasReproduction and bf:reproductionOf are 
> subproperties of only bf:hasEquivalent with a domain and range of 
> bf:Instance.
>
> bf:originalVersion and bf:originalVersionOf expresses the relationship 
> between versions of Works (such as a book and it's movie remake); 
> while bf:hasReproduction and bf:reproductionOf allows for the 
> relationship between Instances (such as a photograph and the digitized 
> copy of the photograph).
>
> I know it's not fun to look at, but the secrets to BF are hidden in 
> it's RDF source code <http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe.rdf>:
>
>     <owl:ObjectProperty
>     rdf:about="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/originalVersion">
>             <skos:definition>Resource is the original version of which
>     this resource is a
>                 reproduction.</skos:definition>
>     <rdfs:subPropertyOf
>     rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/derivativeOf"/>
>             <rdfs:comment>Used with Work or Instance</rdfs:comment>
>             <rdfs:label>Original version</rdfs:label>
>             <rdfs:comment>Expected value Work or Instance</rdfs:comment>
>             <owl:inverseOf
>     rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/originalVersionOf"/>
>             <dcterms:modified>2016-04-21 (New)</dcterms:modified>
>             <dcterms:modified>2016-04-29 (added inverse, updated
>     range)</dcterms:modified>
>         </owl:ObjectProperty>
>         <owl:ObjectProperty
>     rdf:about="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/originalVersionOf">
>             <skos:definition>Original version of a
>     resource.</skos:definition>
>     <rdfs:subPropertyOf
>     rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/hasDerivative"/>
>             <rdfs:comment>Used with Work or Instance</rdfs:comment>
>             <rdfs:label>Original version of</rdfs:label>
>             <rdfs:comment>Expected value Work or Instance</rdfs:comment>
>             <owl:inverseOf
>     rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/originalVersion"/>
>             <dcterms:modified>2016-04-21 (New)</dcterms:modified>
>             <dcterms:modified>2016-04-29 (added inverse, updated
>     range)</dcterms:modified>
>         </owl:ObjectProperty>
>
>         <owl:ObjectProperty
>     rdf:about="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/hasReproduction">
>     <rdfs:domain
>     rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/Instance"/>
>     <rdfs:range
>     rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/Instance"/>
>             <skos:definition>Resource that reproduces another
>     Resource.</skos:definition>
>     <rdfs:subPropertyOf
>     rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/hasEquivalent"/>
>             <rdfs:label>Reproduced as</rdfs:label>
>             <owl:inverseOf
>     rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/reproductionOf"/>
>             <dcterms:modified>2016-04-21 (New)</dcterms:modified>
>             <dcterms:modified>2016-04-29 (added
>     inverse)</dcterms:modified>
>         </owl:ObjectProperty>
>         <owl:ObjectProperty
>     rdf:about="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/reproductionOf">
>     <rdfs:domain
>     rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/Instance"/>
>     <rdfs:range
>     rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/Instance"/>
>             <skos:definition>Resource that is a reproduction of
>     another Resource.</skos:definition>
>     <rdfs:subPropertyOf
>     rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/hasEquivalent"/>
>             <rdfs:label>Reproduction of</rdfs:label>
>             <owl:inverseOf
>     rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/hasReproduction"/>
>             <dcterms:modified>2016-04-21 (New)</dcterms:modified>
>             <dcterms:modified>2016-04-29 (added
>     inverse)</dcterms:modified>
>         </owl:ObjectProperty>
>
>
> Also whether we like it or not, BIBFRAME has to accommodate legacy 
> MARC data, so it seems that the 
> bf:originalVersion/bf:originalVersionOf and 
> bf:hasReproduction/bf:reproductionOf will accommodate for MARC 534 and 
> 533 data. However in the 5XX mapping tables 
> <http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/mtbf/ConvSpec-5XX-R1p.xls> published by 
> LC, 534 and 533 refer to the Linking Entries mapping tables 
> <http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/mtbf/ConvSpec-760-788-Links-R0p.xlsx> and 
> those properties are not listed there. So I'm curious how properties 
> are actually being mapped ny LC. It would be useful to find an example 
> and run it through the MARC to BF Comparison Tool 
> <http://id.loc.gov/tools/bibframe/compare>. Still these properties set 
> up a good foundation for recording relationships between version and 
> reproductions outside of the MARC environment.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Best,
> Amber Billey
>
> PCC BIBFRAME Task Group Co-Chair
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Joseph Kiegel <[log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
>     Please clarify the meaning and use of the originalVersion and
>     originalVersionOf properties.  The only hint in the definition is
>     that the relationship is one of “reproduction”.  However, the
>     reproduction relationship, which is one of equivalence not
>     derivation, is already covered by hasReproduction and reproductionOf.
>
>