Yes, genre headings is the better option as you can use more than one and they work in all MARC formats (I've started adding "655 Novels" where appropriate), but our new catalog uses LitF so we're stuck with it.
John Lavalie | Cataloging and Metadata Specialist | Des Plaines Public Library | www.dppl.org
The LitF values are very limited and very broad. I suppose more could be added, but it would never be possible to have more choices than the 26 letters a-z plus digits 0-9. For purposes of faceted searching, I agree with Naun and I think it would be more productive to focus our efforts on using genre terms, which offer much more granularity and flexibility.
Christopher Thomas, M.L.S.| Electronic Resources and Metadata Librarian
Law Library · University of California · Irvine
4. APPROVED CHANGE
In the Bibliographic format:
Change the name of 008/33 - Books from "Fiction" to "Literary form"
Change the name of the following values in 008/33 - Books:
0 Not fiction (not further specified)
1 Fiction (not further specified)
Add the following values to 008/33 - Books:
c Comic strips
h Humor, satires, etc.
j Short stories
m Mixed forms (Used for multiple literary forms (the item
is known to be literary but more than one code applies).
LCs rationale for opposing the “Approved change” would seem to have been:
“It is extremely difficult to ameliorate the differences between the USMARC practices and the CAN/MARC
practices. The relationship between the USMARC codes and the CAN/MARC codes is 1-to-many, and there frequently is little in a record to help make the translation."
John G. Marr
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, NM 87010
**"I really like to know the reasons for what I do!"**
Opinions belong exclusively to the individuals expressing them, but sharing is permitted.
Ah, it was part of format harmonization between USMARC & CANMARC.
For the MARBI proposal that led to this change, which includes the rationale, see: http://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/1996/96-8rrp2.html
Head, Original & Special Collections Cataloging
University of Maryland Libraries
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Trina Pundurs <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Adam L. Schiff <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I’m not aware of the reason for this longstanding policy.
C'mon, I can't believe I'm the only one here who's been around long enough to remember when 008/33 was defined as "Fiction" and the only valid values were 0 and 1.