Print

Print


The original poster asked if there was "any movement to use [LitF] more aggressively". I don't believe there is, but a related development that may be worth mentioning is the recent report to SAC on faceted vocabularies:


www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/PoCo-2017/BraveNewFacetedWorld-170713.pdf


The report advocates for the use of LCGFT (among other vocabularies) and discusses the possibility of mapping LitF to genre/form terms. There's a lot to be said for preferring the easily understandable, MARC-independent, linked-data friendly genre/form vocabulary over the continued use of fixed fields for this type of information. There are mapping and alignment issues we'd still have to work through, but I think this is a direction PCC should explore.


Naun.


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Chew Chiat Naun
Head, Metadata Creation
Information & Technical Services, Harvard Library
625 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA  02139
________________________________
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of James L Woods <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 05 December 2017 10:22:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] LitF


Same here at Wisconsin.



Jamie Woods



************************************



From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Deborah J. Leslie
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 9:14 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] LitF



I don't know about others, but we at the Folger make pretty full use of it.



Deborah J. Leslie | Folger Shakespeare Library | [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> |



From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Lavalie
Sent: Tuesday, 05 December, 2017 09:41
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [PCCLIST] LitF



We're moving to a new catalog that uses the fixed field element LitF to populate a facet.  We've never paid much attention to LitF, so we're going to have to start now.



I've noticed that in OCLC, few records go beyond 0 and 1.  What are the guidelines for LC and PCC?  Is there a movement to use this element more aggressively?





John Lavalie | Cataloging and Metadata Specialist | Des Plaines Public Library | www.dppl.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.dppl.org_&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=cYvH4KdFMqovZijO7eBBto5LWB23bGEMSfHU_p8CRKo&m=LQG5qVAE7dYvXY3Yr0brU3fukKYok0HLWg3CLg4p_ik&s=XFmv7HGWy68xwejKaPl0mH4KIimXQoqAelHeEbnqUmc&e=>