Print

Print


I understood that  phase shift as a result of normal EQ in a mono track, or 
the same phase shift applied to both channels is inaudible. But phase shift 
can be audible  when applied to only one channel of a stereo track, as it 
affects the stereo image, because we perceive a source's location partly 
through the arrival times of the signal to each of our ears.

Tim


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lou Judson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 3:06 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Multiple conversions


Adding to my previous comment - with good convertors it is fine, and for 
your artistic use no problem!

<L>

Lou Judson - Intuiitive Audio
415-883-2689

It all comes down to �Adjust All Controls For Best Sound� in the end.



On Jan 23, 2018, at 5:55 AM, Steve Smolian <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> This is not to adjust recording eq with itzs reciprocal playback eq.
>
> This would be to add subjective eq,  I'm working with many orchestral 78s
> from the early electrical era.  Mike placement varies so much from session
> to session that it takes a long time to adjust each set.  Knowing that I 
> can
> get back and make adjustments later, if needed, is comforting.  I'm used 
> to
> using parametrics in the analog domain to get the sound of massed strings
> "right" as that also clarifies the distinctive sounds of the solo wind
> players.
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ted Kendall
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 6:28 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Multiple conversions
>
> Not all digital EQ exhibits the same phase characteristics as the 
> equivalent
> analogue network, and this is important when applyng RIAA playback EQ, for
> example.
>
>
> On 23/01/2018 11:09, Lou Judson wrote:
>> I don't know in the ARSC community, but in generalaudio engineering,
> digital EQ can be more accurate and efficient than analog, and can be done
> in faster than real time. Why would you want to do that, I'm curious.
>>
>> Mastering engineers do some work in analog domain, but not just simple 
>> EQ.
>>
>> <L>
>> Lou Judson
>> Intuitive Audio
>> 415-883-2689
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2018, at 9:07 PM, Steve Smolian <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Using 96/24 throughout, what is present thinking about converting from a
> digital file to analog, equalizing, and reconverting, using 2 computers 
> and
> 2 converters?
>>>
>>> Steven Smolian
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>