Print

Print


I agree with what's been said, but I'm curious--what would the compilation
work's AAP be? We'll presumably need that if the compilation gets
translated.

Stephen

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Finnerty, Ryan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Kate,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply, this is very helpful!
>
>
>
> --Ryan
>
>
>
> *From:* Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]
> GOV] *On Behalf Of *Policy and Standards Division
> *Sent:* Friday, January 19, 2018 2:41 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: [PCCLIST] Correspondence of Camus and Casarès
>
>
>
> Ryan,
>
>
>
> If two people are writing a letter or letters together, it can be
> considered a collaborative work. I have never had this situation in
> cataloging, but my mom and dad used to send me letters like that so I would
> never say never.  When two people are writing back and forth to each other
> and the book contains many of those letters, it is considered a compilation
> of two compilations of the works of one creator.  Assuming that the book
> contains letters written by Camus AND letters written by Casarès, you would
> probably want to have analytical added entries for both like this:
>
>
>
> 700 12 $a CasareÌs, Maria. $t Correspondence. $k Selections.
>
> 700 12 $a Camus, Albert, $d 1913-1960. $t Correspondence  $k Selections.
>
>
>
> There would be no 100, but you might need a 130.  You might also need
> other additions in those 700s like $l English.  I did not look at the
> bibliographic record so I don’t know what else might be needed.
>
>
>
> I have seen books that contain letters written only by Person A to Person
> B and not vice versa.  In that case it is appropriate for Person A to be
> considered the creator of the work because Person A is the writer of all
> the letters.  Then you would probably have a 100 for Person A and a 240
> with a conventional collective title.  Person B might be in a 700.  It is
> difficult to tell from the titles what the situation is.  Just because
> there are two people’s names in the title doesn’t mean that two people have
> written the letters.  Your example is more clear because they are given in
> the statement of responsibility.
>
>
>
> Kate
>
>
>
> Kate James
>
> Policy and Standards Division
>
> Library of Congress
>
>
>
> *From:* Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]
> GOV <[log in to unmask]>] *On Behalf Of *Finnerty, Ryan
> *Sent:* Friday, January 19, 2018 5:08 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* [PCCLIST] Correspondence of Camus and Casarès
>
>
>
> Hello PCC List,
>
>
>
> Gallimard recently published the correspondence between Albert Camus and
> Maria Casarès. The book contains letters written by each of them.
>
>
>
> Correspondance : 1944-1959 / Albert Camus, Maria Casarès
>
> 9782072746161
>
> OCLC# 1010979515
>
>
>
> The OCLC record is coded as RDA and it has Camus in the 100 field. In
> order for Camus to properly be in the 100 field, this would need to be
> considered a collaborative work (RDA 6.27.1.3).
>
>
>
> I’m more of the view that this is a compilation by two different authors
> since (in my view anyway) each letter can stand on its own as a separate
> work. If this is the case, then this should be entered under title
> according to RDA 6.27.1.4.
>
>
>
> I looked in OCLC for other RDA records for correspondence and have seen
> them cataloged both ways with no one way predominating.
>
>
>
> What do you all think? Should collections of correspondence between two
> different people be considered collaborative works or compilations?
>
>
>
> Thanks for your advice!
>
>
>
> *Ryan J. Finnerty* | *Head, Database and Authorities Management & NACO
> Coordinator  *
>
> UC San Diego Library | 9500 Gilman Drive | La Jolla, CA 92093
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=9500+Gilman+Drive+%7C+La+Jolla,+CA+92093&entry=gmail&source=g>
> | MC 0175-K
>
> T: 858.822.3138 <(858)%20822-3138> | [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Stephen Hearn, Metadata Strategist
Data Management & Access, University Libraries
University of Minnesota
170A Wilson Library (office)
160 Wilson Library (mail)
309 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Ph: 612-625-2328
Fx: 612-625-3428
ORCID:  0000-0002-3590-1242