This whole issue of CD-Rs and DVD-Rs being reliable for archiving precious files is driven by the multi-billion dollar wedding video-graphy business. This is an outright scam when the recording media wont even last the lifetime to show one's kids let alone the grand-kids. The other maxim is to keep the original recordings be they film or tape. And duplicate digital back-ups are really only an answer, but sadly not guaranteed for longevity. With hard-drives in order to keep the bearings and discs spinning it is necessary to play them on a regular basis. CJB On 22/05/2018, Bryan Martin <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Faculty of Music concerts at UofT were archived on very expensive, > archive-quality HHB discs from about 1999 to 2014. Around 2007 we > discovered, quite by accident, that some of these were failing within 6 > months. That led to a massive push to rip the content from these discs. Some > were recoverable only by doing a 1x speed transfer from a TASCAM CD-210 to > an HHB CD-recorder. Out of nearly 1000 recordings, several dozen were > completely unrecoverable, and a few hundred were recovered but with > noticeable damage to the audio. A lot of the discs had very pronounced > clicking, which we found could be removed satisfactorily using declicking > software. The primary lesson learned is that a manufacturer's reputation is > not particularly trustworthy. When I reached out to HHB, I got a terse reply > from a sales rep, and nothing but crickets thereafter. > > We now archive digital recordings on a dedicated file server (for immediate > access), a NAS box (as a backup), and to M-Disc DVDs, which have proved to > be very robust so far. > > As far as TY CD-Rs go, wasn't the main selling point that they burned > essentially error-free? That's great, but I think experience teaches us that > dye-based media can't be counted on for durability, regardless of who makes > them. > > > Bryan Martin, MusBac, MA > Technical Supervisor > Music Library > University of Toronto > (416) 978-3739 > https://music.library.utoronto.ca > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List > <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Steven Smolian > Sent: May 14, 2018 7:11 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R life > > Not specifically, but there was no evasive words used. > > Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Eli Bildirici > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 6:43 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R life > > Hahaha, I don't doubt. Do you remember what they said? > > -------- Original Message -------- > From: Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 06:13 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R life > >>Back in the day when I was on the AES committee creating the standards for >> testing CDs, I saw an outrageous claim by TY in a print ad. I contacted >> them and was told that they arrived at their figures by tweaking the >> testing parameters to give their product the best results. Exactly why >> we need standards. >> >>Steve Smolian >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List >>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Eli Bildirici >>Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 4:29 PM >>To: [log in to unmask] >>Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R life >> >>(IOW, in my initial post here, which I am now realizing you weren't >>responding to, I should have specified that TY's dye composition/mfr >>process lives on, somehow, under CMC. I realize now that the way I >>phrased it in my reply to you sounded ambiguous. Carry on) >> >>-------- Original Message -------- >>From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]> >>Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 04:12 PM >>To: [log in to unmask] >>Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R life >> >>> >>> Eli, are you saying geniune Japanese TY CDRs are still available? If so, >>> where, or is it secret? >>> >>> <L> >>> Lou Judson >>> Intuitive Audio >>> 415-883-2689 >>> >>> On May 14, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Eli Bildirici >>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>> > I am aware, but iirc error tests with e.g. CD-DVD Speed show the CMC >>> > Mag disks are less robust than the Japanese manufactured ones, though >>> > the formula is the same. This may have affected long-term longevity >>> > somewhat too but it's only been a couple of years, so it's hard to know >>> > for sure. In any case the theme in this thread seems to be 'dye >>> > matters, and proper storage matters quite a lot as well'. >>> > I should have mentioned that they are still available though and are >>> > still probably your best bet. >>> > >>> > -------- Original Message -------- >>> > From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]> >>> > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 03:33 PM >>> > To: [log in to unmask] >>> > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R life >>> > >>> >> >>> >> TY formula still available: >>> >> <https://www.amazon.com/CMC-Pro-Powered-Technology-Watershield/dp/ >>> >> B000LUC8WW> >>> >> <http://www.microboards.com/blank-media/cmc-pro-media/cmc-pro-cd-r >>> >> -media> >>> >> search for TY CDrs for more info. >>> >> I won’t use anything else, until forced to. >>> >> <L> >>> >