Thanks for clarifying that.  I wasn’t sure whether you use the LCCN or the ARN.



From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Moore, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 10:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 667 for authority records reported for deletion


Just to confirm that we also add the LCCN after “in favour of”.







Richard Moore

Authority Control Team Manager

The British Library


Tel.: +44 (0)1937 546104                                  

E-mail: [log in to unmask]      




From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cuneo, Mary Jane
Sent: 02 May 2018 15:36
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] 667 for authority records reported for deletion


Hello PCCList,


A while ago there was a discussion on this list about the use of a 667 to identify an authority record that has been reported to LC for deletion.  Most agreed that the note would be useful to alert catalogers to the status of the record and redirect them to the correct one.  Robert Bremer allowed that the note would be acceptable from a systems perspective.  Afterwards, I had an email conversation with Richard Moore and Paul Frank about whether the 667 should have a standard wording.  I have intended for some time to share our conclusions, and now finally I’m getting around to it!  We thought that the note didn’t need to be standardized, but if it reliably included a couple of words (like “reported” and “deletion”) it would be easy to find all of the records so marked, if needed.  


So, by way of illustration, but not prescriptive, we use:


British Library:

667  Duplicate record; reported for deletion in favour of


Harvard Library

667  Duplicate record, reported for deletion in favor of [LCCN] ([date])


Mary Jane Cuneo

Serials cataloging and NACO

Information and Technical Services

Harvard Library





Experience the British Library online at

The British Library’s latest Annual Report and Accounts :

Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book.

The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled


The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the [log in to unmask] : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.

The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author.


Think before you print