Print

Print


Hi All,

I recently transferred 4 reels of AMPEX 478 that was SSS so beware.

As far as Qantegy is concerned:

When Quantegy took over the AMPEX facility, they sold some re-branded 
AMPEX stock that has since gone bad. As I understand it, once the 
production line was purged and Quantegy began producing stock with their 
own formula (Starting with a revised AMPEX formula) the stock seemed OK. 
Quantegy changed their formula a couple of times, getting completely 
away from any AMPEX formulas, before closing their doors for good.

Cheers!

Corey

Corey Bailey Audio Engineering
www.baileyzone.net

On 8/7/2018 10:10 AM, Aaron Coe wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> FWIW I actually recorded to Quantegy 478 for The National Archives back in the early 2000’s, and I can confirm that some of those reels are already showing signs of sticky shed.  My rule of thumb these days is that if it has backcoating, it is most likely going to need to be baked.
>
> -Aaron
> _____________________
> http://cuttingcorporation.com
>
>
>
>> On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:42 AM, Mint Records <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been sent a consignment of reels to transfer, most are BASF so should
>> be fine. However a few are Ampex 478. I've tried to research these reels
>> and they aren't listed as having problems on Richard Hess's site, but
>> others seem to think they might still have a problem and need baking.
>>
>> Opinions?
>>
>> One BASF tape (a studiomaster 911) shows signs of having been in wet or at
>> least damp conditions. Any opinions of the best was to proceed? - The tape
>> it's self (although a little dirty, but not thankfully mouldy) looks OK,
>> but due to the previous exposure to damp, would anyone recommend baking for
>> safeties sake?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Richard Moore
>>
>> (Apologies for posting from an odd account, my personal e-mail keeps
>> rejecting ARSClist emails)