I am reluctant to add gender to a record except when the name itself is ambiguous or misleading and I have reasonable evidence that the person has a specific preference.  For the most part, I am waiting for the proposal on gender to be approved.

                                                                                Steve McDonald
                                                                                [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Shorten, Jay
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 2:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] Citing proof of gender in 670 for 375

Is there a best practice citation format for proof of gender in the 670 for the data we put in the 375? Is there a best practice as to when to do it? Obviously we should do it in doubtful or unusual situations, but would it be odd to do this for everyone?

Example: our person's name is Shelby R. Gilley. Our proof that this is a man's name is on page 63 (Shelby Gilley wrote about his friendship). Would "page 63 (his)" be sufficient? Or even "page 63 ([male])"? I have found cases where the only proof is the name itself as a clearly masculine or feminine name, or the only proof is the author's picture.

Jay Shorten
Cataloger, Monographs and Electronic Resources
Associate Professor of Bibliography
Description & Access Department
University Libraries
University of Oklahoma
Co-ordinator, Oklahoma (Tornado) NACO Funnel
Co-owner, PERSNAME-L, the list about personal names in bibliographic and authority records
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>