Print

Print


How so?  I would think that the new 1XX would require the qualifiier.

Gene Fieg

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 8:47 AM Adam L Schiff <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Since breaking the conflict on the 4XX requires less BFM, I believe that
> is preferable.
>
>
> Adam
>
>
> Adam Schiff
>
> Principal Cataloger
>
> University of Washington Libraries
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]> on
> behalf of Benjamin A Abrahamse <[log in to unmask]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2019 8:12:52 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Qualifying a 1xx or a 4xx?
>
>
> When we are establishing a new NAR and discover that our 1xx conflicts
> with a 4xx on another record, is it better to add a qualifier to the 1xx on
> the new NAR, or to add retrospectively a qualifier to the old 4xx? I have a
> sense that the latter is the preferable solution but I’m not 100 percent
> certain.
>
>
>
> --Ben
>
>
>
> Benjamin Abrahamse
>
> Cataloging Coordinator
>
> Acquisitions & Discovery Enhancement
>
> MIT Libraries
>
>
>