I checked these out.  So that is the way we do it now, apparently.  Note that the last LCCN given provides two different records for two unrelated works.

I think we have been over this before.  But why not use $f for date no matter whether it is a work or an expression?  Shouldn't uniform titles be expressed uniformly?  Is the patron supposed to know or understand the difference?

Gene Fieg

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 10:23 AM Ehlert, Mark K. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Three real-world examples in the NAF:

 

LCCN no2014123011

LCCN no2019122447

LCCN no2018070738

 

--

Mark K. Ehlert                                 Alma: NA02
Cataloging and Metadata Librarian          Primo: MT NA01

O'Shaughnessy-Frey Library, University of St. Thomas

<http://www.stthomas.edu/libraries/>

 

  "Experience is by industry achieved // And perfected by

the swift course of time"--Shakespeare, "Two Gentlemen of

Verona," Act I, Scene iii

 

 

 

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2019 12:07 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [External] Re: [PCCLIST] Qualifiers for "Selections"

 

I see that.  I don't see an example of Selections (date), but rather Selections. #f 1968.

 

Gene Fieg

On Wednesday, December 4, 2019, Robert Maxwell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Date of work is an element that can be used to distinguish an access point for a work from that of another entity. See RDA 6.27.1.9.

 

Robert L. Maxwell
Ancient Languages and Special Collections Librarian
6728 Harold B. Lee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
(801)422-5568

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 7:29 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Qualifiers for "Selections"

 

Is (date) allowed after Selections?  I mean the parentized form of expressing it.  

 

Gene Fieg

Cataloger Ret'd