We’ve been talking about whether the relationship should be work-to-work or not. In some ways it does make sense and we don’t necessarily have to record every reciprocal combination.

 

If this does go to the profiles group, would you all mind sending out whatever conclusions/futher discussions you come up with?

 

Thank you!

Liz

 

From: PCC LD4P2 Cohort List <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Nancy Lorimer
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 1:16 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCC-LD4P2] Question about series tracing?

 

Hmm, that's one way of doing it I hadn't thought of--making it a separate instance. Tim, would you like explain the reasoning behind your model?

 

Nancy

 

 


From: PCC LD4P2 Cohort List <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Dobbs, Zoe <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 12:08 PM
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [PCC-LD4P2] Question about series tracing?

 

I’m not a profile creator, but we have a RT in the instance profile called Series Information (Yale:RT:BF2:Series:Instance). It has transcribed fields, a lookup to series authorities, and can also link to a series work in Sinopia (Yale:RT:BF2:Series:Work). I’ve not had to create my own series work yet, though.

 

Zoe

 

From: PCC LD4P2 Cohort List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jesse Lambertson
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 2:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCC-LD4P2] Question about series tracing?

 

once more thought before the weekend

 

It looks like the URIs, if added to the series statements, are entered as strings, as opposed to URIs...

maybe this is what you are thinking about Christine

 

Feature Request to make use of linked data?

 

i am thinking yes... [smiley face emoji]

 

have a good weekend


From: PCC LD4P2 Cohort List <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Christine DeZelar-Tiedman <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 13:24
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [PCC-LD4P2] Question about series tracing?

 

We've considered using "related work" or "related instance" but we're not sure whether this is appropriate.

 

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:14 PM Jesse Lambertson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

great topic

 

I know that since LC is not establishing series names any longer, this might have dropped as a priority for them - not sure

 

thank you for bringing this up

 

have a good weekend


From: PCC LD4P2 Cohort List <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Nancy Lorimer <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 12:46
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [PCC-LD4P2] Question about series tracing?

 

Ah series. We have been discussing series with LC for the past few years, and have not really come to any agreement. Personally, I am not happy with how they have modeled series in BF and I believe this is the same with a few others. Now that we have the basic profiles working (except for my messing it up yesterday), and people have more experience, it is time to start discussing in more depth how certain parts of our profiles should be modeled.

 

Perhaps this is a topic for the next profiles meeting?

 

Nancy


From: PCC LD4P2 Cohort List <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Miraglia, Elizabeth <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 10:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [PCC-LD4P2] Question about series tracing?

 

How are people handling traced series in their instance records? We have a series statement template that is basically a 490 but we also trace series in our bibs and there are times when that might be handy in Sinopia.

 

Thanks!

Liz


 

--

--

Christine DeZelar-Tiedman  

Metadata and Emerging Technologies Librarian | University of Minnesota Libraries
160 Wilson Library | 309 19th Ave. S. | Minneapolis, MN 55455             

[log in to unmask] | (612) 625-0381  

she, her, hers