Michelle,
Thanks. I did have the “Special Provisions” in mind when thinking about my question. As you say, they are much looser than section 4 of H 1790, and certainly seem to me to allow the use of a topical heading for Christmas in a record
for a novel about Christmas. It seems to me that if “Christmas – Fiction” would be allowed by these provisions, the preferred “Christmas stories” ought to be acceptable in its place.
Pete Wilson
Vanderbilt University
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
On Behalf Of Cronquist, Michelle J
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 3:37 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] "Christmas stories" and similar subject headings
I think the “SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INCREASED SUBJECT ACCESS TO FICTION” at the end of H 1790 are actually the current guidelines for applying subject headings to fiction, which are much more permissive
than the section 4 that Mike references below.
---
Michelle Cronquist (she/her/hers)
Special Collections Cataloger
Special Collections Technical Services
CB#3926, Wilson Library
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
919-962-4271
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
On Behalf Of Monaco,Michael J
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 3:53 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] "Christmas stories" and similar subject headings
H 1790 section 4 does put fairly strict limits on SH for individual works of fiction. (Only used for biographical and historical fiction, basically.) The “Special provisions” at the end of H
1790 still refer to GSAFD headings, so IMO the section needs updating.
But per H 1790 section 4, you still only use very specific 650s. So “650 Deer hunting – Fiction” is ok, but “Hunting—Fiction” is too general. 655s are generally fine. If I understand H 1790.
Mike Monaco (he/him)
Coordinator, Cataloging Services
261B Bierce Library
The University of Akron
Akron, Ohio 44325-1712
Office: 330-972-2446
ORCID: 0000-0001-7244-5154