It would need to be a 650, I believe as it is “fictitious.”


From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Denis Brunke
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 9:38 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] pseudonymous geographic name heading

Our university press person asked me about a subject heading (for a geographic place) in the CIP block for a new book. The name in question is:

n  88194374
Kalikaha (Côte d'Ivoire)

The author of the new book had published an earlier work on this town back in 1998, prompting DLC to create the above authorized name.
It turns out this place name is a pseudonym; the author wanted to protect the villagers in the town where she does ethnographic research, so she uses a pseudonymous name (which is clearly stated in this new book).

My question: is it OK to have a pseudonymous geographic name in the name authority file? Should I just add a 670 field clarifying that this name is pseudonymous?

Denis Brunke
Original Cataloger
University of Wisconsin--Madison
312 Memorial Library
728 State Street
Madison, WI 53706
Phone: (608) 262-3529
Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>