This particular issue was not dealt with in Module 6 but there is a recent FAQ on the NACO website that deals with it:

 

https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/; then go to the bullet point

Working with “Undifferentiated” conventional collective title work and expression authority records: FAQ

 

Or the direct link is here.

https//www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/naco/documents/FAQ-AAP-Collections.docx

 

The FAQ was posted before the “Feasibility study” for deemphasizing conventional collective titles with “Selections” (see FN 3 in the FAQ). The outcomes of that study have not been published nor have policies been made yet. The FAQ will be revised when policies have been made on this issue.

 

Meanwhile, the main point was that differentiation between various “selections” of an author are made at the work level, so generally speaking we’d expect some sort of qualifier after the word “Selections” if there are more than one collection of a person’s selected works. But the trend is to simply name the collection by using the name of the collection found on the manifestation.

 

Note: the Feasibility study only applies to conventional collective titles (and as I said, final decisions on policy have not been made). Selections from an individual work will continue to be treated as described in the FAQ.

 

Bob

 

 

 

Robert L. Maxwell
Ancient Languages and Special Collections Librarian
6728 Harold B. Lee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
(801)422-5568

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Yang Wang
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 2:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Establishing an expression-level name/title series

 

Dear Collective Wisdom,

 

When one wants to establish an expression-level name/title series for (Works. Selections), where should one turn to for examples of PCC’s best practices? I looked closely in the NACO training modules 6 (works and expressions) and 6s (series) and Session 6a-b of the more elaborate “NACO Series Training” but could not find an example similar to the following:

 

[log in to unmask]">

 

The record looked fine to me, until I saw this:

 

[log in to unmask]">

 

Without the books in hand, It is difficult to know what 2003, 2007, and 2012 represent exactly. Different expressions or simply manifestations? How could one tell if the intellectual contents, i.e., “Der Ling, Princess. Works. Selections” is NOT the same? Well, let us just suppose they are different compilations. Would be much better to qualify “Selections” first?

 

Der Ling, Princess. $t Work. $k Selections (2003). $l Chinese

Der Ling, Princess. $t Work. $k Selections (2007). $l Chinese

Der Ling, Princess. $t Work. $k Selections (2012). $l Chinese

 

But if they are indeed the same compilations in Chinese translation--no changes or revisions, then, $f 2003, $f 2007, and $f 2012 seem superfluous to me, unless one wants to treat them as dates of manifestation. At this point, however, we are not supposed to establish manifestation-level authority records, are we?!

 

Best regards,

Yang

PUL