One record I came across, no2015102446, looks like this (some fields not represented): 100 0_ Jane $c (Fictitious character from Card) 368 __ $c Fictitious characters $c Artificial intelligence $2 lcsh 400 0_ Jane $c (Artificial intelligence) -- Mark K. Ehlert Alma: NA02 Cataloging and Metadata Librarian Primo VE: NA02 O'Shaughnessy-Frey Library, University of St. Thomas <https://www.stthomas.edu/libraries/> "Experience is by industry achieved // And perfected by the swift course of time"--Shakespeare, "Two Gentlemen of Verona," Act I, Scene iii On Mar 10, 2021, at 12:31 PM, Benjamin A Abrahamse <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: I have a book that was co-written by an artificial intelligence named GPT-3. It is listed on the title page as an author, and credited in the preface for authoring the parts of the book; not to mention included in the copyright statement. I don’t see any AIs in the NAF (though how to search for them is a good question) but it seems to me the way to establish it under current RDA rules would be quite similar to the way we treat fictitious characters: 100 0# $a GPT-3 $c (Artificial intelligence) 368 ## $a Artificial intelligence 670 ## $a Regulating AI, c2020: ǂb t.p. (GPT-3) pref. (we ask AI to make some forward looking projections about how it sees AI and law interacting in the future) I realize that under the revised RDA this might require additional coding because of its anthropocentricity, but IIRC that has not yet been implanted, correct? --Ben Ben Abrahamse Metadata Librarian MIT Libraries [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>