In reality what “Dev Team” is doing – their best GFE-2-Deliver (yes, Good Faith Estimate of their Efforts to deliver that undertaken tasks / work); and hence
with asking themselves to be self-accountable, being a team – an autonomous who knows to self-organize & self-manage at their best, with the mentoring, guiding & coaching of their Scrum Master and/or Agile Coach, “Commitment” is the rightly used.
Forecast is very light word to be used here in this light. Yes, Forecast is backed by substantial data and/or derived information, but will it be accompanied
by the Accountability of the Doers ? Forecast is mostly used by professionals in Business : Finance & Accounting, Sales & Marketing and at other such teams.
I never heard any Sports Team Forecasting their WINS in any championship, but yes they are COMMITED for the WINS at their best.
I second the thought of Mike for the use of “Commitment”.
Sincerely,
Mahesh Panchal
IT Specialist, Design & Development
Office of Chief Information Officer
Library of Congress
847-303-0801
[log in to unmask]" style="width:1.6388in; height:.6597in" src="cid:[log in to unmask]">
Words mean things and I really like the use of “Commitment”.
On: 02 September 2021 10:21, "Shirley, Robert L." <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Here’s an article I came across that talks about how the subtle difference in language can make a big difference in how we see things when it comes to the work we do (or don’t do) in a sprint.
Bak in 2011, the
Scrum Guide changed over from using “Commitment” to “Forecast” when talking about the work agreed to by the development team in a sprint. This was done to change the perception.
What are your thoughts? Do you think it matters? Is it important to have “commitments”?
https://www.scrum.org/resources/commitment-vs-forecast
Bob Shirley
Supervisory IT Specialist, Design & Development
Office of Chief Information Officer
Library of Congress
(410) 874-3156 w / (336) 681-0182 c
[log in to unmask]" style="width:1.6319in; height:.6597in" src="cid:[log in to unmask]">