Print

Print


     Element:  <odd> and <add>
        We have a few comments on the discussion concerning <odd> and
     <add>.  We do not think <add> should be moved into the <archdesc>, as,
     by its very definition, it is not part of the archival description.
     We do think, however, that <separatedmaterial> should be allowed
     within <odd>, as it is "information about the material being
     described" as opposed to "information that will assist in the use of
     the materials being described, but is not in itself archival
     description."


     Catherine Johnson
     Project Director


     Kate Culkin
     SGML Project Specialist

     Dance Heritage Coaltion