Print

Print


Received: from rs8.loc.gov by metgate.metro.org ; 25 MAR 98 11:56:59 EDT
Received: from rs8 (rs8.loc.gov [140.147.248.8])
          by rs8.loc.gov (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
          id LAA27764; Wed, 25 Mar 1998 11:45:48 -0500
Received: from RS8.LOC.GOV by RS8.LOC.GOV (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with
          spool id 365150 for [log in to unmask]; Wed, 25 Mar 1998 11:45:26 -0500
Received: (from rbar@localhost) by rs8.loc.gov (8.8.4/8.8.4) id LAA161208 for
          [log in to unmask]; Wed, 25 Mar 1998 11:45:25 -0500
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 11:45:25 -0500
Reply-To: Encoded Archival Description List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Length: 1331
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: Encoded Archival Description List <[log in to unmask]>
From: Randall Barry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Duplicate messages to list
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
To: Multiple recipients of list EAD <[log in to unmask]>

EAD list subscribers

Starting yesterday the EAD list software started bouncing messages
for some strange reason.  I am trying to figure out what is happening.
I've never gotten messages from the list itself before.  I'm hoping
it has not become a scient being with plans to confuse us all.

--Randy Barry (your puzzled list administrator)

*****************************************************************
* Randall Keigan Barry                          LL              *
* Senior MARC Standards Specialist              LLL             *
* U.S. Library of Congress                      LLL             *
* Network Development and MARC Standards Office LLL     CCCCC   *
* 101 Independence Avenue, S.E.                 LLL   CCC   CCC *
* Washington, DC 20540-4102  U.S.A.             LLL  CCC        *
* TEL: +1-202-707-5118                          LLLLLLLLLL      *
* FAX: +1-202-707-0115                                CCC   CCC *
* NET: [log in to unmask]                                     CCCCC   *
*****************************************************************
* NOTE: The ideas and opinions expressed in this communication  *
*  are personal and do not necessarily reflect the position of  *
*  the Library of Congress or any other U.S. government agency. *
*****************************************************************